Bridging the divide: Policy solutions for Latinx Student Loan Justice
Executive Summary
Latinx borrowers are disproportionately burdened by student loan debt due to systemic inequities in education, income, and access to financial resources. They graduate with student loans at rates comparable to or higher than their White peers, while significantly exceeding those of Asian graduates. Despite increased college enrollment, Latinx students often attend community colleges and for-profit institutions and receive less financial aid, leading to greater loan reliance. Though their initial debt may be lower, slower post-graduation earnings result in prolonged repayment struggles. This issue is compounded by factors like first-generation college status, limited family wealth, and financial literacy gaps. Resolving this crisis necessitates targeted policies, including increased need-based aid, loan forgiveness, and culturally competent financial education, which are crucial for advancing equity in higher education, economic mobility, and wealth distribution.
Introduction
Student loans disproportionately impact Latinx borrowers, exacerbating existing racial wealth disparities due to systemic inequities, thus hindering economic mobility for Communities of Color. Recent reports show that student loan debt in the United States has reached unprecedented levels, skyrocketing from $500 billion in 2006 to nearly $1.8 trillion in 2024, now second only to mortgages. Latinx students are now taking on student loans at rates comparable to, or even exceeding, other demographic groups, including White and Asian students. This disproportionate reliance on student loans has remained persistent over time; in 2015, 70% of Latinx bachelor’s degree graduates had student loans, compared to 68% of White and 44% of Asian graduates. In 2021, similar patterns persisted, with 70.1% of Latinx students holding federal student loans, compared to 67.7% of White students and 43.9% of Asian students. In this policy brief we leverage key themes from the literature underscore the disproportionate student debt burden facing Latinx borrowers, the systemic causes driving these inequities, and the long-term consequences for economic mobility and wealth accumulation. We later unpack these points further by putting them in concert with the changes emanating from the recent passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill. We conclude by advancing a justice agenda that centers the structural causes, severe economic ramifications of student loan debt, and the actionable policy solutions needed to foster equity and economic mobility.
The Problem: A Growing and Disproportionate Burden
Student loan debt in the United States disproportionately affects Latinx students, leading to significant long-term financial hardships and exacerbating racial wealth disparities. Recent legislative changes, particularly the One Big Beautiful Bill, are likely to worsen these inequities by eliminating key income-driven repayment plans, capping federal borrowing for graduate programs, ending hardship deferments, and restricting Public Service Loan Forgiveness eligibility. These changes will push many borrowers, especially Students of Color, into riskier private loans, increase lifetime repayment costs, and remove critical protections that have helped manage debt during financial instability.
Latinx borrowers face additional systemic barriers that heighten their debt burden, including predatory lending tactics, and inadequate financial advising, often compounded by immigration status concerns and language barriers. In addition, Latinx households possess only one-fifth of the wealth of White households, restricting access to family financial support and increasing reliance on student loans. This reliance is compounded by institutional disparities, as Latinx students are more likely to attend underfunded community colleges and for-profit institutions with higher tuition, lower graduation rates, and weaker labor market outcomes. These factors create structural disadvantages that magnify the financial risks of pursuing a degree and trap Latinx families in cycles of borrowing and severely hinder economic mobility.
The Impact: Hindering Economic Mobility and Wealth Accumulation
The escalating student loan debt has severe consequences for Latinx borrowers that must be named plainly:
Increased Loan Default: 40% of Latinx borrowers have experienced loan default over the last two decades, significantly higher than the 29% for White borrowers. In addition, 75% of Latinx borrowers who defaulted did so multiple times, as compared to 56% of White borrowers.
Systemic Barriers Driving Repayment Challenges: Latinx borrowers are more likely to face a combination of financial constraints (e.g., lower household incomes, unstable employment, higher living costs) along with burdens such as consumer debt and family financial obligations. Among borrowers who have experienced default, 53% of Latinx borrowers lived in states with higher-than-average living expenses, compared with 24% of White borrowers.
Negative Net Wealth: Student loan debt is a primary driver of negative net wealth. Latinx college graduates with student loan debt have, on average, $36,000 less in net worth by age 30 compared to their peers without such debt.
Limited Use of Repayment Protections: While 32% of Latinx borrowers had ever enrolled in income-driven repayment plans, only 18% were enrolled most recently, which is a steep drop compared to White borrowers (from 31% to 26%). Many tend to rely on temporary pauses (56%), which provide short-term relief but increase long-term costs due to accruing interest.
Policy Recommendations
Despite the clear evidence of racial disparities, federal higher education policymaking often employs "race-evasive" discourse––policies and discussions that avoid explicitly acknowledging race or racial inequities, even when they are central to the issue––using universalistic language that fails to explicitly address the unique structural barriers faced by Latinx borrowers. This approach hinders the development of targeted solutions. To promote economic justice and ensure higher education serves as a pathway to opportunity for Latinx students, the following policy changes are crucial:
Broaden financial aid policies to account for the racial wealth gap. Federal financial aid formulas should incorporate wealth metrics, not just income, to provide a more accurate assessment of a family's ability to pay. As highlighted above, research shows that Latinx households possess only one-fifth of the wealth of White households, leaving students more dependent on borrowing. Further, students from low-wealth families, including over one-quarter of Latinx FASFA filers, borrow significantly more and repay loans more slowly than their wealthier peers, even when their incomes are similar. Adjusting aid calculations to account for this disparity would expand equitable access to aid and reduce the disproportionate burdens borne by many Latinx students.
Increase protections for borrowers against predatory lending. Stronger regulations and oversight are needed to protect students from predatory financing institutions and products, particularly targeting those that exploit vulnerable populations. Although private loans make up only 8% of student debt, they account for over 40% of borrower complaints to the CFPB, often about unaffordable payments and abusive servicing practices. With the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill, Latinx borrowers are likely to be pushed into these loans, which lack federal protections such as relief and carry high interest rates and default risks. Enhanced enforcement of the broader state-level oversight such as California’s Student Loan Servicing Act can serve as models for federal action.
Restore and Expand DEI Initiatives: The rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs has removed essential support structures for Black and Latinx students. Policymakers should reinvest in and expand these programs within higher education institutions, especially those that support Black and Latinx students and institutions founded to foster the development of Communities of Color. Programs such as the Title V Developing Hispanic-Serving Institutions Program provide examples of how federal investments can improve academic and financial outcomes for Latinx students.
Halt Involuntary Loan Collections and Provide Debt Relief: Involuntary collections on defaulted loans deepen financial precarity for borrowers who are already struggling. The Department of Education should immediately cease these practices and expand access to debt relief. Promising models for broad-based cancellation include recent federal debt cancellation initiatives and targeted forgiveness programs for public service workers, which should be expanded to focus on those most burdened by the current system.
Eliminate usurious interest on student loans. Congress should pass legislation to cap or eliminate high interest rates on student loans, following the precedent of temporary zero-interest policies during the COVID-19 payment pause, which significantly improved borrowers’ ability to manage debt.
Expand opportunities for debt cancellation to all student loan borrowers. Recent reforms such as major PSLF expansions for public service workers and SAVE-plan relief for millions demonstrate the effectiveness of both broad and targeted cancellation programs. Broadening eligibility to all borrowers regardless of institution type, current borrower income, default status, or repayment plan can ensure equitable relief for Latinx borrowers disproportionately affected by debt burdens.
Ban negative credit reporting for delinquent or defaulted federal student loans. A recent attempt by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) to ban medical debt from credit reports illustrates the potential of removing certain debts from credit reporting to reduce systemic harm. Although the rule was later overruled, its design aimed to lessen the negative impacts of historic and ongoing inequities that have left Communities of Color, particularly Black and Latinx households, with greater debt burdens and fewer financial resources. Applying a similar reform to federal loan defaults would protect Latinx borrowers’ access to housing, employment, and future credit, while mitigating the structural barriers that disproportionately affect them.
Reinstate and Increase Federal Student Loan Funding: Legislative actions like the FY2018 Omnibus Appropriations Act have successfully expanded Pell Grant funding and supported low-income, first-generation students through programs such as the Federal TRIO Programs. The reductions in federal student loan funding should be reversed to ensure adequate resources for all students, particularly those from historically marginalized communities.
Ensure Transparent Financial Advising: Institutions should be required to provide comprehensive, culturally competent, and language-accessible financial advising for all students, especially at the point of college enrollment, to ensure full understanding of loan options and long-term repayment implications. Research shows that gaps in financial literacy and advising contribute to lower enrollment in beneficial repayment plans among Latinx borrowers. As recommended by UnidosUS, loan and aid information should be delivered through trusted sources––such as universities and TRIO Programs––given the higher levels of debt aversion among Latinx borrowers.
Address Immigration Status and Language Barriers: Institutions should develop and disseminate clear, multilingual information regarding student loan options and repayment, free from fear-mongering related to immigration status. Targeted resources for Latinx families, many of whom speak English as a second language, can help bridge communication gaps and ensure equitable access to critical financial aid information.
Support and Utilize Research on Borrower Impacts: Ongoing funding for borrower-focused research should be prioritized to guide evidence-based policymaking. Applying these findings into policy design can enable targeted solutions––such as prioritizing outreach to borrowers in high-default communities and tailoring interventions to the specific needs of affected communities.
By implementing these measures, policymakers can begin to dismantle the systemic inequities that disproportionately burden Latinx borrowers, fostering economic mobility and ensuring that higher education truly offers a pathway to a brighter future for all.
A Debt-Free Future
The disproportionate burden of student loan debt on Latinx borrowers is a critical issue that demands immediate and targeted policy intervention. Addressing the student loan debt crisis for borrowers of color requires a multifaceted approach that tackles systemic inequities, reinstates crucial support systems, and provides meaningful debt relief. By addressing the institutional disparities and predatory practices that contribute to this burden, policymakers can work to dismantle the barriers to economic mobility and ensure that higher education truly offers a pathway to a brighter future for Latinx borrowers and all students. Implementing these policy recommendations will not only alleviate financial burdens but also contribute to greater educational equity and economic stability for Latinx communities and society as a whole.
References
Bennett, N., Dudo, A., Besley, J., & Irizarry, Y. (2024). Race-evasive ideology in U.S.-based
science communication fellowship director discourse. JCOM, 23(01), A06. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.23010206.
The California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation. (2025). Student loan debt: A
disproportionate burden on Black and Latino borrowers. https://dfpi.ca.gov/news/insights/student-loan-debt-a-disproportionate-burden-on-black-and-latino-borrowers/.
Equity Research Cooperative. (2025). Latinx borrower’s study literature review.
Hanson, M. (2025). Student loan debt vs. other debts. Education Debt Initiative.
https://educationdata.org/student-loan-debt-vs-other-debts.
Healthy People 2030, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.). Social determinants of health. https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health.
Libassi, C. J. (2018). The neglected college race gap: Racial disparities among college
completers. Center for American Progress. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/neglected-college-race-gap-racial-disparities-among-college-completers/.
Perez, L., Bernardo, S., Chui, M., & Calvo, A. P. (2021). The economic state of Latinos in
America: The American dream deferred. McKinsey & Company. https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/sustainable-inclusive-growth/the-economic-state-of-latinos-in-america-the-american-dream-deferred.
The Pew Charitable Research Trusts. (2024). The student loan default divide: Racial inequities
play a role.
https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/reports/2024/12/the-student-loan-de
fault-divide-racial-inequities-play-a-role#.
Student Borrower Protection Center. (2020). Disparate debts: How student loans drive racial
inequality across American cities. https://protectborrowers.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/SBPC-Disparate-Debts.pdf.
Thomsen, E., Peterson, C., & Velez, E. D. (2020, July). One year after a bachelor’s degree: A
profile of 2015-16 graduates. (NCES 2020-341). Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Zhan, M., & Xiang, X. (2018). Education loans and asset building among Black and Hispanic
young adults. Children and Youth Services Review, 81, 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.06.006.
